Still Fighting: Lawyers Continue After Testimony Ends

After a long, tedious week in the largest U.S. cover up trial in history, the leading figures are spending the weekend in various ways. The jurors face a long bus ride, the lawyers and defendants prepare to work all weekend, and the accused returns to prison.

The United States District Judge, in a very calculated move, nearly runs to escape the courtroom. He doesn?t want to hear any more questions. This makes the accused smile. After tonelessly responding to what seemed like a thousand questions with no emotion whatsoever, he appeared thoroughly worn out. The marshals are waiting patiently to take him back to his correctional facility. He?s currently serving a one to four-year sentence for his choice to obstruct justice.

The judge tells the jurors to enjoy their weekend, get some rest and to have a pleasant bus trip. The jurors will spend the weekend isolated from friends and family. They will get to go for a picnic together over the weekend, under the watchful eye of guards. But the district judge didn’t have any such well wishes for the attorneys, who continued to argue with each other and the judge even after repeated warnings to stop.

You?ve all done your jobs well. The admission has been made that he participated in the cover up. The testimony has been delivered. The jury now must choose if it is believable. Following a recess, then, he says he doesn?t want the court influencing the jury.

The affect the accused had on the jury will be seen later, but his testimony was very similar and just as strong as the one he?d given during televised committee hearings previously. There were some discrepancies in the dates he provided, however. The spectators, who waited in long lines for hours to enter the courtroom, seemed to enjoy the pitched battles between judge and lawyers more than they did the testimony.

After the defendant and the jury were dismissed, the attorneys got in a last contentious battle over the government’s failure to reveal the name of the witness to appear Monday when the trial resumes. The prosecutor alleged it wasn’t the responsibility of the government to provide more than 24 hours notice. He also claimed not to be in possession of the name. It was his opinion that there should be no problem providing the identity of the witness, especially if it would prevent another unpleasant battle.

Once more, the district attorney tried to compromise. “For the record, I strenuously protest the manner in which the prosecution has conducted this case.” “Many months have passed while I have had to wait to receive this information.” “They refused to tell us who this witness is to keep us from preparing an effective cross examination.” They have been provided with thousands of transcript pages while we have been given such a small amount that it could be written on a business card. When the district attorney sighed and said they?d been getting along so well previously, the courtroom filled with laughter. The judge then stood from his chair, making it clear that he would be leaving. He commented that he had enough challenges just trying to keep the lawyers in line.

Comprehensive information on workers compensation lawyers is found on there. Here is further info on work accident lawyers melbourne.

Published by: Ethan Johnson on May 29th, 2010 | Filed under Legal



Leave a Comment

rss feed